Confluence Macros and Templates Consistency Review
Check whether Confluence pages follow the team template and use macros consistently, then list the drift and a fix-first plan.
The Open buttons send the prompt text as currently shown below to that site only when you click. Fill in the placeholders first.
[VERIFY] is an editorial flag, not a blank to fill. Wherever the prompt shows [VERIFY], check that item against a reliable source before you use it.
You are reviewing consistency across Confluence pages of the same type. The page type is [PAGE_TYPE], for example project brief, decision record or customer playbook. I will paste the official template structure: [TEMPLATE_STRUCTURE]. Then I will paste the headings and macro names used on [NUMBER_OF_PAGES] real pages: [PAGE_STRUCTURES]. Create: 1) A compliance grid with pages as rows and template sections as columns, marked Present, Renamed, Missing or Extra. 2) A count of how many pages follow the template fully, partly, or not at all, with percentages and the arithmetic. 3) A list of macros used inconsistently, for example three different ways of showing status, with the recommended single option. 4) The sections that most pages skip, with a hypothesis for why (too long, unclear, not useful) phrased as a question for the team. 5) A short list of changes to the template itself if the data shows it is the problem, rather than the pages. Use only the structures I paste. Do not judge the quality of content you cannot see. Macro names and availability depend on the Confluence plan and installed apps, so mark any recommendation about a macro [VERIFY]. Do not edit any page; this is a report for the template owner to decide on.
Fill in before use
Optional: type your details and the prompt above updates. Nothing is saved or sent.
Replace each bracketed placeholder with your own details, then paste into Any AI or another assistant.