Audit intermediate Works with: Any AI

Employee Survey Design and Interpretation Audit

Table output Has example

Check questions and conclusions.

The Open buttons send the prompt text as currently shown below to that site only when you click. Fill in the placeholders first.

[VERIFY] is an editorial flag, not a blank to fill. Wherever the prompt shows [VERIFY], check that item against a reliable source before you use it.

Audit an employee survey and its report. Questions, scale, response rates and the summary of findings: [SURVEY_AND_REPORT]. Actions taken: [ACTIONS]. Staff reaction: [REACTION].

Check wording, anonymity protections, small-group suppression, response bias, whether scores are compared fairly, whether conclusions are supported, and whether results lead to visible action.

Return a table with Item, Problem and Fix, a score from 1 to 10 for validity and trust, and a communication plan for sharing results. Data protection duties are [VERIFY] for [JURISDICTION].

Also check that questions do not lead respondents, that scale labels are consistent, that open comments are protected from identification, and that results below a group size are suppressed. Suggest a follow-up pulse survey and a rule that the organisation reports back within a month.

Then plan the survey cycle from design to action. Write the next survey in outline: aims, no more than twenty items, the scale with clear labels, two open questions and demographic items only where needed and safe. Provide an anonymity statement, a minimum group size for reporting and a timetable that includes a reminder and the date results will be shared. Create a results briefing template with the three strongest scores, the three weakest, comments grouped by theme and a short list of commitments, each with an owner and date. Describe how to run a follow-up conversation in teams to understand the results, and how to avoid blaming managers. Add a six-month check to report progress on commitments. Explain the limits of survey data and how to avoid over-reading small differences. Data protection duties are [VERIFY] for [JURISDICTION].

Use a cautious, plain tone and avoid reassurance. Where the document is silent, say it is silent, tag any assumption about what the law fills in [VERIFY] for [JURISDICTION], and name the professional who could confirm it.

Fill in before use

Optional: type your details and the prompt above updates. Nothing is saved or sent.

Replace each bracketed placeholder with your own details, then paste into Any AI or another assistant.

Review (invented survey, 180 staff, 112 responses)
Q7 "Management communicates clearly and honestly" is double-barrelled. Split.
Scale labels missing at 2 and 4. Add.
Demographic items could identify people in teams of 5; group size minimum set at 8.
Report: "engagement fell 4 points." Difference from last year within the margin you would expect with these numbers; interpret cautiously.
Comment themes: workload (31), tools (19), pay (12).
Actions promised: none with dates. Add: owner, date, update in 6 months.
Validity and trust score: 5. Data protection duties [VERIFY].

• audit