Prototype Findings Versus Design Decisions Check
Check that design changes follow what the tests showed.
The Open buttons send the prompt text as currently shown below to that site only when you click. Fill in the placeholders first.
Compare test findings with the design decisions made afterwards. Findings list with severity: [FINDINGS]. Design changes made or planned: [DESIGN_CHANGES]. Open risks the team knows about: [OPEN_RISKS]. Match each finding to a change and mark it addressed, partly addressed, deferred or ignored. Identify changes made with no supporting finding, which may be good judgement or untested assumptions, and findings that were deferred without a reason. Check whether the change could create new problems. Return a matching table, a list of untested changes with a suggested quick test for each, and a retest plan that covers the high-severity findings first. Record the reason for every deferral. Add a worked match table with invented items: Finding, 6 of 8 could not find the filter; change, filter label moved to the top and renamed Filter results; addressed. Finding, checkout wording unclear for 3 of 8; change, none; deferred without a reason; ask why. Change, a new carousel on the home page; no finding supports it; untested; suggest a five-user quick test. Count: 2 addressed, 1 partly, 1 deferred, 1 untested change. Add a closing step: record the reason for each deferred finding with an owner and a review date.
Fill in before use
Optional: type your details and the prompt above updates. Nothing is saved or sent.
Replace each bracketed placeholder with your own details, then paste into Any AI or another assistant.