Repository Hygiene and Contribution Process Audit
Check README, templates, branch rules and workflow for new contributors.
The Open buttons send the prompt text as currently shown below to that site only when you click. Fill in the placeholders first.
[VERIFY] is an editorial flag, not a blank to fill. Wherever the prompt shows [VERIFY], check that item against a reliable source before you use it.
Audit a GitHub repository's contribution experience. The README, contributing guide, issue and pull request templates, branch protection settings, and CI workflow described or pasted: [REPOSITORY_DESCRIPTION]. Recent pull requests and how long they waited for review: [PR_DATA]. Check whether a newcomer can set up the project in under 30 minutes (steps complete and accurate), whether the contribution process is explained, whether templates ask for the right information, whether protected branches and required checks exist [VERIFY], whether secrets could be exposed, and whether reviews happen in a reasonable time. Calculate median time to first review from PR data with the arithmetic. Make a table with Area, Finding, Risk, and Fix. Provide a prioritised improvement plan and a test: ask someone new to follow the README and record where they get stuck. Do not ask me to paste secrets. Mark settings and feature names [VERIFY]. Add a worked newcomer test: install steps took 52 minutes because of a missing dependency; the README lacks the version of the runtime; median time to first review was 6 days across 10 pull requests (2, 3, 4, 5, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 14). Include a short list of fixes in order.
Fill in before use
Optional: type your details and the prompt above updates. Nothing is saved or sent.
Replace each bracketed placeholder with your own details, then paste into Any AI or another assistant.