Create intermediate Works with: Any AI

Talk Track by Persona

Table output Has example

Tailor messages to each stakeholder.

The Open buttons send the prompt text as currently shown below to that site only when you click. Fill in the placeholders first.

Rate this prompt

Loading ratings…

Create talk tracks by persona. Product and value: [PRODUCT_AND_VALUE]. Personas (titles, goals, fears, metrics they own): [PERSONAS]. Proof by persona: [PROOF_BY_PERSONA]. Typical objections: [OBJECTIONS].

For each persona, return: Priorities and language | Opening line (25 words) | Value statement (40 words) tied to a metric they own | Discovery questions (5) | Proof to share | Likely objection and response (40 words) | Call to action.
Example for a finance director: "Finance leaders I talk to are asked to cut close time without adding staff. Teams like yours have reduced month-end close by two days by automating reconciliations [use only verified proof]. How long does your close take today?"

Then write the email version of each opening (60 words) and a table of "words to use" and "words to avoid" per persona. Provide a one-page persona cheat sheet and a method to update talk tracks from call recordings. Rules: avoid stereotypes, base statements on actual customer research, and flag hypotheses. Do not invent proof.

Fill in before use

Optional: type your details and the prompt above updates. Nothing is saved or sent.

Replace each bracketed placeholder with your own details, then paste into Any AI or another assistant.

See an example result (fictional data)
Persona: finance director.
Priorities and language: close time, accuracy, audit trail. Avoid: "seamless".
Opening line (25 words): "Finance leaders I speak to are asked to cut close time without adding people. How long does your close take today?"
Value statement (40 words): "Customers like yours reduced month-end close from 9 working days to 6 by automating reconciliations [use only verified proof]."
Discovery questions: Which tasks take longest? Where do errors appear? Who reviews? What does the auditor ask for?
Proof: case study with 3-day improvement (permission confirmed).
Objection: "We use spreadsheets and they work." Response (40 words): "They do work, and many teams start there. The question is how much time the checking takes."
CTA: 20-minute walk-through of their close calendar.
Email version (60 words) shortened from the opening.

Illustrative only, made-up data. Your results will differ and must be reviewed.

Related prompts