Search Results Page UX Review
Evaluate how search results help or hinder decisions.
The Open buttons send the prompt text as currently shown below to that site only when you click. Fill in the placeholders first.
ROLE: You are a UX specialist in search and listing pages. CONTEXT: Site: [WEBSITE_NAME] with search over [CONTENT_OR_PRODUCT_TYPE]. Description of the results page: layout, result card fields, filters, sorting, pagination, empty state, and typical queries: [DESCRIBE_RESULTS_PAGE]. Query logs summary: [QUERY_LOG_SUMMARY]. Devices: [DEVICES]. STEPS: 1. Evaluate result card clarity (title, image, key facts), scannability, relevance cues, filters and facets, sort options, result counts, pagination or infinite scroll, and the zero-result and few-result states. 2. Check that keyboard and screen reader users can use the filters and understand updates after filtering. 3. Identify the five changes that would most reduce time to find the right item. 4. Write the microcopy for the empty state and the "did you mean" suggestion. 5. Propose a test plan using five realistic search tasks and success measures. OUTPUT FORMAT: Evaluation table with scores 1 to 10, five changes, microcopy, and the test plan. QUALITY BAR: Base findings on the description and logs supplied, and tell me what to verify live. FOLLOW-UP: Ask me for the ten most frequent queries and how well the top results satisfy them.
Fill in before use
Optional: type your details and the prompt above updates. Nothing is saved or sent.
Replace each bracketed placeholder with your own details, then paste into Any AI or another assistant.