Product and Pricing Claims Compliance Review
Review marketing claims for substantiation.
The Open buttons send the prompt text as currently shown below to that site only when you click. Fill in the placeholders first.
Screen marketing claims for substantiation. This is an editorial risk screen, not legal advice. Product and market: [PRODUCT_AND_MARKET]. Jurisdiction: [JURISDICTION]. Evidence I have (tests, studies, certifications, customer data): [EVIDENCE_AVAILABLE]. Marketing copy: [PASTE_COPY]. Go through each claim and answer these checks: [ ] Is it a factual claim (can be proven) or opinion/puffery (obviously subjective)? [ ] Do I have evidence that supports exactly what is said, not something similar? [ ] Are comparisons fair (same conditions, current data, named basis)? [ ] Are "free", "guaranteed", "best", "#1", "clinically proven", "eco-friendly", and "natural" supported or avoided? [ ] Are prices, discounts, and "was/now" prices accurate and current? [ ] Are limitations, conditions, and extra costs disclosed clearly where the claim appears? [ ] Are testimonials typical or are results disclosed as not typical? [ ] Are required disclosures present (sponsorship, affiliate, material connections)? Return a table: Claim | Type | Evidence | Risk (low, medium, high) | Safer wording | Action. Summarize the five riskiest claims. Have a lawyer or compliance adviser who knows [JURISDICTION] verify the final copy.
Fill in before use
Optional: type your details and the prompt above updates. Nothing is saved or sent.
Replace each bracketed placeholder with your own details, then paste into ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude or another assistant.